• Play radio station
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • OUR PROGRAM
    • WEEKLY SCHEDULE
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

Monthly Archives: September 2020

presidential debate

An Eye on the 2020 United States Presidential Debate

September 30 2020
Elections, Presidential debate, US

The first presidential debate in the American elections 2020 took place yesterday 29 September at 9:00 pm eastern time (Today 30 September at 2:00 am in Algeria) between democratic candidate Joe Biden, and the Republican president Donald Trump. The debate was held in Case Western Reserve University, one of the top-ranked private research university in the US, and it is located in Cleveland, Ohio.

The debate was moderated by the Fox News Journalist Chris Wallace, who is the anchor of the famous chat show “Fox News Sunday”. The journalist Wallace explored some of the most heated subjects in the US such as the decision made by President Trump to nominate Amy Coney Barrett to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in which Trump argued that Barrett is a “phenomenal nominee, respected by all” and added, “We won the elections, and elections have consequences.” This subject sparked a debate as Biden called out against the timing of this decision, and he had called the decision earlier “An abuse of power.”

The debate covered more controversial subjects such as President Trump’s performance during the Covid-19 pandemic, Health care and insurance, the US Economy, race, and violence in America, Climate change, in addition to the integrity of the elections.

You can watch the full debate here

Author: Abdelwahab Ait Tayeb.

cancel culture

Is Cancel Culture Canceling Free Speech?

September 21 2020
cancel culture

Since December of last year, the famous author of the Harry Potter series, J. K. Rowling, has been sharing her thoughts on transgender issues on Twitter, which brought her a lot of backlash due to the controversial nature of her tweets. One example is a tweet she made in early June of this year, which sparked a wave of criticism of her views and many people calling to “cancel” her.

cancel culture

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, to cancel someone (usually a celebrity or other well-known figure) means to stop giving support to that person. The act of canceling could entail boycotting an actor’s movies or no longer reading or promoting a writer’s works. The reason for cancellation can vary, but it usually is due to the person in question having expressed an objectionable opinion, or having conducted themselves in a way that is unacceptable so that continuing to patronize that person’s work leaves a bitter taste.” 

Lisa Nakamura, a professor at the University of Michigan, who studies the intersection of digital media and race, gender, and sexuality, says about cancel culture,” it is a cultural boycott. It is an agreement not to amplify, signal boost, give money to. People talk about the attention economy- when you deprive someone of your attention, you’re depriving them of a livelihood.” 

When did the term originate?

The hashtag #cancelled originated in Black Twitter back in 2015 where it was used to call out several problematic people or products.

One of the early uses of the term was in an episode of a 2016 web series called “Joanne the Scammer,” in which a character struggles to use an espresso machine, then she says,” You know what? That’s over. It’s canceled. We don’t need coffee when we have sparkling water.” It was basically just a joke when it was used in that show. The writer of that episode, Jason Richards, said in an interview with journalist Jonah Engel Bromwich,” I think the humor of it comes from how inhumane it is. To cancel a human is just a funny way of putting it. Joanne is someone who scams people, and the word canceled seems of that world, of reservations being canceled and credit cards being canceled.”

He also said,” It speaks to a lifestyle of commodity, consumerism, and capitalism, of transactions being canceled. It’s a very transactional word.”

  In his piece on cancel culture in the New York Times, Jonah Engel Bromwich interviewed Professor Lisa Nakamura who said that cancel culture came from a desire for control. “People have limited power over what is presented to them on social media platforms, which are notorious for being poorly regulated. When YouTube refused to defenestrate Logan Paul after he posted a deeply insensitive video in December, she said, individuals were compelled to take matters into their own hands, doing the work of deplatforming him instead of waiting on deliverance from YouTube.” He wrote.

“Socially irredeemable things are said on platforms all the time. Cancellation creates a culture of accountability which is not centralized and is haphazard, but needed to come into being,” Professor Nakamura said.

How can someone be canceled? 

The act of canceling revolves around the idea of boycotting someone who had inappropriate or controversial behavior, whether it was in the past or in the present.

Callouts are a form of cancellation that describes the act of throwing someone out from social and professional circles, either online, in real life, or both. Most canceling is done online and that is by sharing hashtags and bringing people’s attention to the behavior of the person to be canceled and calling them to boycott their work. 

Canceling is not only restricted to using hashtags and calling people out online but it can have some serious consequences on the work and lives of the people who get canceled. After the wide criticism the British author J.K. Rowling received these past months, employees at her publisher refused to work on her upcoming book. 

Who can be canceled?

A lot of the time, people who usually get canceled are celebrities or public figures who have a certain influence on people and who might have had a problematic or controversial behavior in the past.

In 2018, comedian and actor Kevin Hart was called out for a homophobic tweet he had made 10 years before. After he had announced the news of being chosen to host the 87th edition of the Oscars on his Twitter profile, many people shared 10-year-old tweets of his and jokes he had made that were homophobic. The academy then gave him an ultimatum to either publicly apologize for the tweets or withdraw from hosting the Oscars. He said on his Twitter profile that he had already addressed the matter several times before and had apologized before. He then stepped down from hosting the Oscars and presented another apology in which he said,” I have made the choice to step down from hosting this year’s Oscar’s….this is because I do not want to be a distraction on a night that should be celebrated by so many amazing talented artists. I sincerely apologize to the LGBTQ community for my insensitive words from my past.”

cancel culture

In June of this year, the New York Times published an opinion piece by American Republican Senator Tom Cotton where he called the military to give an “overwhelming show of force” in order to regain order in the US during the protests over the killing of George Floyd.

The piece received great criticism for “promoting hate” and putting Black journalists in danger.

James Bennet, the editorial page editor who published the article, tweeted in response to the public criticism:

“Times Opinion owes it to our readers to show them counter-arguments, particularly those made by people in a position to set policy. We understand that many readers find Senator Cotton’s argument painful, even dangerous. We believe that is one reason it requires public scrutiny and debate.”

James Bennet ended up resigning. 

Is Cancel Culture Canceling Free Speech?

   In early July of this year, around 150 international authors, academics, and commentators signed an open letter in Harper’s magazine to denounce ‘the intolerance of opposing views’. Among the figures involved were American political activist and linguist, Noam Chomsky, author J.K. Rowling, novelist Salman Rushdie, Canadian author Malcolm Gladwell, and Algerian writer Kamel Daoud.

  The signatories showed their support for current social and racial justice movements but they argued that “this needed reckoning has also intensified a new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity. As we applaud the first development, we also raise our voices against the second.”

  The signing of the letter came in the wake of the spread of cancel culture and online shaming. People have been getting canceled and facing serious consequences, sometimes for merely speaking their views, which the majority may not agree with. “Editors are fired for running controversial pieces; books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity; journalists are barred from writing on certain topics; professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class; a researcher is fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study, and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes.” 

  Many would agree that not all speech can be tolerated. There are types of speech that bring more harm, hate, and division like racial slurs than they bring any good. This type of speech should be called out and socially unaccepted. Yet calling to silence other types of speech because they are perceived as morally wrong or are not popular may put open debate under attack, as the open letter argues,” The way to defeat bad ideas is by exposure, argument, and persuasion, not by trying to silence or wish them away. We refuse any false choice between justice and freedom, which cannot exist without each other. As writers, we need a culture that leaves us room for experimentation, risk-taking, and even mistakes.” 

Author: Meriem Saoud.

Sources:

The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/28/style/is-it-canceled.html

Harper’s Magazine: https://harpers.org/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate/

The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/is-cancel-culture-silencing-open-debate-there-are-risks-to-shutting-down-opinions-we-disagree-with-142377

Billboard: https://www.billboard.com/articles/events/oscars/8492982/kevin-hart-oscar-hosting-controversy-timeline

Merriam Webster online dictionary.

suicide

Copycat Suicide: Does Talking About Suicide Increases its Rates?

September 19 2020
papageno effect, suicide, werther effect

In 1774, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote The Sorrows of Young Werther, a loosely autobiographical epistolary novel that generated an overnight fascination. Once unknown, Goethe had now become hugely famous and the novel started a copycat culture called The Werther Fever, a fanatical behaviour where young European men dressed in Werther’s signature clothing as described in the novel, and a perfume called Eau De Werther was produced. 

But the effects of this phenomenon were not limited to harmless behaviours. This novel had also led to the first known examples of copycat suicides. The story, revolving around unrequited love, ends with the protagonist taking his own life after realizing there is no other way to escape that love triangle except for death. Soon after its publication, young men started to mimic Werther’s suicide by dressing up in the same clothes, and using similar pistols. Many times, the book was even found at the scene. This resulted in the book being banned from several places, and the appearance of The Werther Effect to label copycat suicides. 

Coined by David Phillips, The Werther Effect means a triggering increase in suicide rates, generally carried out in the same manner as the reported suicide. After conducting several studies, Phillips concluded that: “Hearing about a suicide seems to make those who are vulnerable feel they have permission to do it.” He also found that publicized suicides increased the suicide rate for the next month by about 2 percent on average. And that of a famous person even worse; the rate rose by 12% after Marilyn Monroe’s death. 

Media and Suicide.

The media is found guilty of copycat suicides in most situations. The extreme publicity and glorified portrayal of suicide on television more often than not lead to increases in suicide rates, especially within groups of the same age in the reported cases. After the graphic depiction of the protagonist’s suicide in the Netflix show 13 Reasons Why, experts warned of a surge in copycat suicides, that unfortunately had later come true. After the show aired in March, a study conducted in April of the same year showed that there was an increase of 29% in suicide rates in America alone. The story of this family is one example.

That link, however, is correlational. Although the show is associated with the sudden spike in rates, it does not prove cause and effect. That is where health experts draw the line between shying away from conversations about suicide (in fear that they cause the Werther Effect) and initiating them in a responsible manner that brings awareness to mental health instead.

The Papageno Effect.

This is where the Papageno Effect comes into play. It is named after a character in Mozart’s opera The Magic Flute, who was contemplating death while in despair until three characters appear and convince him that there are other solutions to his problem. Papageno being advised not to take his own life, parallels the different reaction media could have on vulnerable individuals when discussing suicide. 

When reports about suicide are carried out responsibly, the results are positive. Talking about suicide in ways that normalize seeking help, and encouraging mental health conversations generate the Papageno effect of a reality where individuals are not afraid to speak, and reach out for the support they need, without being looked down from society. 

Author: Nour Nachoua Nait Ali.

 

 

Recent Posts

  • 2020: Has It Really Been that Bad of a Year?
  • Mandala Art: The Symbol Of The Universe
  • Red Herring: Mystery’s Secret
  • Why is Social Reform so Difficult to Achieve?
  • Violence against Women, Social Taboo?

Recent Comments

  • Linkedin Şirket Takipçi Satın Al on Copycat Suicide: Does Talking About Suicide Increases its Rates?
  • Vimeo Takipçi Satın Al on Copycat Suicide: Does Talking About Suicide Increases its Rates?
  • Periscope Canlı Yayın İzleyici Satın Al on Copycat Suicide: Does Talking About Suicide Increases its Rates?
  • Periscope Beğeni Satın Al on Copycat Suicide: Does Talking About Suicide Increases its Rates?
  • Periscope Takipçi Satın Al on Copycat Suicide: Does Talking About Suicide Increases its Rates?

Archives

  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • July 2019

Categories

  • Creative Writing
  • Education & Opportunities
  • Enviornment & Pets
  • Films & Media
  • Foreign Press Centers
  • General
  • Literature & Arts
  • Personal Experiences
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry and Prose
  • Psychology
  • Short Stories
  • Social criticism
  • Technology
  • Travel & Culture

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Filter By Author

[pt_view id="6d2f09f97f"]
Follow Us
 
 
 
 

MISSION STATEMENT

Algerian Black Pearl is a Youth-run Online Radio which supports the creation of innovative online media content that reflects the interests of young people. Our mission is to bring together the media and civil society, providing young people with enhanced access to information and increased citizen-led initiatives in society.

NAVIGATION

  • Play radio station
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • OUR PROGRAM
    • WEEKLY SCHEDULE
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US

CONTACT INFO

Address :

Cité du lycée, Rouiba, Alger

Phone :
(+213) 558-22-31-82

e-mail :
Contact@abpradio.com

ALGERIAN BLACK PEARL Logo Header Menu
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • BLOG
  • PROGRAM
    • Weekly Schedule
  • CONTACT US